From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 16, 2024
No. 18849-23 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 16, 2024)

Opinion

18849-23

01-16-2024

DAVID ADAMS, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge.

On January 16, 2024, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on the grounds that petitioner paid the tax liability for tax year 2021 before the issuance of the notice of deficiency and, therefore, the notice of deficiency on which this case is based is invalid. See Bendheim v. Commissioner, 214 F.2d 26, 28 (2d Cir. 1954). In his motion to dismiss, respondent states that petitioner does not object to the granting of the motion.

Upon due consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the grounds that the notice of deficiency on which this case is based is invalid.


Summaries of

Adams v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 16, 2024
No. 18849-23 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Adams v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ADAMS, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jan 16, 2024

Citations

No. 18849-23 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 16, 2024)