holding the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion to file a second amended complaint after "the deadline for further amendments had long since expired"
Summary of this case from Pine Top Receivables of Ill., LLC v. Banco de Seguros Del EstadoNo. 14-158.
10-06-2014
Kendale L. ADAMS, et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
holding the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion to file a second amended complaint after "the deadline for further amendments had long since expired"
Summary of this case from Pine Top Receivables of Ill., LLC v. Banco de Seguros Del EstadoFull title:Kendale L. ADAMS, et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA.
Court:Supreme Court of the United States
Date published: Oct 6, 2014
The NEOC determination submitted by the defendant in support of its motion to dismiss is such material.…
Pine Top Receivables of Ill., LLC v. Banco de Seguros Del EstadoSee Foman, 371 U.S. at 182, 83 S. Ct. at 230 (holding that before dismissing a complaint without allowing an…