From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Beirne

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Apr 23, 2021
No. 12 MM 2021 (Pa. Apr. 23, 2021)

Opinion

No. 12 MM 2021

04-23-2021

TIMOTHY JAY ADAMS, Petitioner v. HONORABLE MAUREEN T. BEIRNE, P.J., AND DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Respondents


ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2021, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED. The Petition for Writ of Mandamus, the "Motion for Immediate Release," the "Motion to Amend," the "Motion to Supplement Record," and the "Motion for Appointment of Counsel" are DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.


Summaries of

Adams v. Beirne

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Apr 23, 2021
No. 12 MM 2021 (Pa. Apr. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Adams v. Beirne

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY JAY ADAMS, Petitioner v. HONORABLE MAUREEN T. BEIRNE, P.J., AND…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 23, 2021

Citations

No. 12 MM 2021 (Pa. Apr. 23, 2021)