From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Albertson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 9, 2011
No. C 10-4787 WHA (MEJ) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 10-4787 WHA (MEJ)

11-09-2011

MARK LETELL ADAMS Plaintiff, v. RONALD ALBERTSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S

OBJECTION TO 11/7/2011

DISCOVERY ORDER

Docket No. 124

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's Objection to the Court's November 7, 2011 Discovery Order, in which it permitted Defendants to go forward with the deposition of Teresa Adams and ordered third parties Apple, Inc., Philip Takakjian, Ph.D, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, and Sequoia Hospital to comply with Defendants' subpoenas by November 15, 2011. Dkt Nos. 122, 123. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and Civil Local Rule 72-2, the proper course for Plaintiff in objecting to a discovery order from the undersigned is to file a "Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge" before the presiding judge in this matter. Accordingly, Plaintiff's objection shall not be considered by the undersigned, and Plaintiff should submit any objections to the presiding judge, William H. Alsup.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Maria-Elena James

Chief United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Adams v. Albertson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 9, 2011
No. C 10-4787 WHA (MEJ) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Adams v. Albertson

Case Details

Full title:MARK LETELL ADAMS Plaintiff, v. RONALD ALBERTSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 9, 2011

Citations

No. C 10-4787 WHA (MEJ) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011)