Opinion
Case No. SC06-63.
June 22, 2006.
Lower Tribunal No. 3D05-2673.
The Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of mandamus which has been treated as a petition for writ of prohibition. The petition is hereby denied as successive. See Jenkins v. Wainwright, 322 So. 2d 477, 478 (Fla. 1975) (declaring that once a petitioner seeks relief in a particular court by means of a petition for extraordinary writ, he has picked his forum and is not entitled to a second or third opportunity for the same relief by the same writ in a different court). To the extent the Petitioner is seeking review of the lower court's decision, the petition is dismissed. See Gandy v. State, 846 So. 2d 1141, 1144 (Fla. 2003) ("[W]e do not have jurisdiction to review per curiam unelaborated denials of relief from the district courts of appeal that . . . merely cite to a case not pending on review in this Court, or to a statute or rule of procedure, and do not contain any discussion of the facts in the case such that it could be said that the district court `expressly addresse[d] a question of law within the four corners of the opinion itself'"). WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE and CANTERO, JJ., concur.