We disagree. See Adams v. Adams, 238 Ga. 326 ( 232 S.E.2d 919) (1977); Whitmire v. Whitmire, 236 Ga. 153 ( 223 S.E.2d 135) (1976). On the relevancy of the husband's alleged misconduct in the future alimony hearing see Bryan v. Bryan, 242 Ga. 826 (1979).
See also Jung v. State, 237 Ga. 73 ( 226 S.E.2d 599) (1976)." Duvall v. State, 238 Ga. 326 ( 232 S.E.2d 919) (1977). Enumeration 6 is without merit.
Therefore, on the authority of Dickson, the trial court properly granted the husband's motion for summary judgment of divorce. Accord, Adams v. Adams, 238 Ga. 326 ( 232 S.E.2d 919) (1977). Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.
It is interlocutory in nature and appealable only through the procedures set out in Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) 2. See Anderson v. Anderson, 237 Ga. 886 ( 230 S.E.2d 272) (1976); Anders v. Anders, 238 Ga. 79 ( 231 S.E.2d 64) (1976); Adams v. Adams, 238 Ga. 326 ( 232 S.E.2d 919) (1977). Since the order granting judgment on the pleadings as to the issue of divorce is an interlocutory order and not a final judgment as contended by appellant, the temporary alimony order is still viable.