From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adamo v. Bergen County

CIRCUIT COURT OF NEW JERSEY, BERGEN COUNTY
Jul 10, 1935
179 A. 685 (Cir. Ct. 1935)

Opinion

07-10-1935

ADAMO v. BERGEN COUNTY.

Chandless, Weller & Selser, of Hackensack, for plaintiff. Walter G. Winne, of Hackensack, for defendant.


Action by Samuel Adamo against Bergen County. On motion to strike out the complaint.

Complaint stricken.

Chandless, Weller & Selser, of Hackensack, for plaintiff.

Walter G. Winne, of Hackensack, for defendant.

CAFFREY, Judge.

This is one of several suits filed against the county of Bergen for the recovery of money alleged to be due the plaintiffs for services rendered as special investigators appointed by the prosecutor of the pleas. The determination with respect to the claim of Adamo will be dispositive of the several suits mentioned.

A motion was made by the county counsel to strike out the complaint filed by Adamo upon the following grounds:

(1) The board of chosen freeholders of the county of Bergen has been improperly joined as a party defendant to the suit.

(2) The summons issued herein is contrary to the provisions of article 17, § 1703, P. L. 1918, ch. 185 (Comp. St. Supp. 1924, § 48—*1703).

(3) The Bergen county circuit court is without jurisdiction to try the alleged cause of action set forth in the complaint.

(4) The facts alleged in said complaint constitute no cause of action against either of the named defendants, in that:

(a) Plaintiff fails to allege to have filed sworn bills for services alleged to have been rendered or to have obtained the approval thereof by the proper authorities.

(b) There is no legal duty on the part of the county of Bergen to pay the plaintiff for the services alleged to have been rendered to the prosecutor of the pleas. Most of these objections have been disposed of by force of the following stipulation:

"1. That the plaintiff, Samuel Adamo, was engaged by the Prosecutor of the Pleas of the County of Bergen, as alleged in said complaint.

"2. That the plaintiff performed the services for the Prosecutor of the Pleas, as alleged in said complaint.

"3. That the bill of the plaintiff was approved by the Prosecutor of the Pleas and by the Judge of the Court of Quarter Sessions, as provided by the statutes.

"4. The said bills have not been approved by the Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Bergen.

"5. The facts stated in this stipulation are limited in their application to the motion to strike."

The question to be considered is the effect of chapter 19, P. L. 1933 (N. J. St. Annual 1933, § 53—95), and its application to the plaintiff's claim. The statute reads as follows: "It shall be the duty of the prosecutor of the pleas for each county to use all reasonable and lawful diligence for the detection, arrest, indictment and conviction of offenders against the laws; and all necessary expenses incurred thereby, certified to and approved under his hand, by a judge of the Court of Oyer and Terminer, or judge of the Court of Quarter Sessions for any county, shall be paid by the board of chosen freeholders thereof, whenever the same shall be approved by such board of chosen freeholders; provided, however, that the amount or amounts to be expended shall not exceed the amount fixed by the board of chosen freeholders in its regular or emergency appropriation, unless such expenditure is specifically authorized by order of the justice of the Supreme Court presiding in such county." This act amends section 95 of the "Criminal Procedure Act," P. L. 1898, p. 901, 2 Comp. St. 1910, p. 1850, which reads as follows: "It shall be the duty of the prosecutor of the pleas for each county to use all reasonable and lawful diligence for the detection, arrest, indictment and conviction of offenders against the laws; and all necessary expenses incurred thereby certified to and approved under his hand, by a judge of the court of oyer and terminer or the judge of the court of quarter sessions for any county, shall be paid by the board of chosen freeholders thereof."

Under this statute of 1898 the judge's certificate is conclusive. Lindabury v. Freeholders, 47 N. J. Law, 417, 1 A. 701; Irving v. Applegate, 49 N. J. Law, 376, 377, 8 A. 505.

It will be observed that under the statute of 1933, under which the plaintiff claims, there has been added: "Whenever the same shall be approved by such board of chosen freeholders; provided, however, that the amount or amounts to be expended shall not exceed the amount fixed by the board of chosen freeholders in its regular or emergency appropriation, unless such expenditure is specifically authorized by order of the justice of the Supreme Court presiding in such county." We are not concerned with the proviso; however, the additional sentence, "whenever the same shall be approved by such board of chosen freeholders," cannot be disregarded. Taking the construction placed upon section 95, P. L. 1898, p. 901, we must conclude that the Legislature at the time of the enactment of the 1933 amendment knew of the existing law, and by force of the amendment attempted and did limit the right of the prosecutor to expend money in the operation of his office.

To sustain the plaintiff's claim, the 1933 amendment would have to be disregarded and the issue determined as of the act of 1898. The court cannot ignore the mandate of the Legislature through the language "whenever the same is approved by the board of chosen freeholders," which relates to "expenses" contemplated both by the act of 1898 and the amendment of 1933. In State (Edmund Bartlett, Prosecutor) v. Inhabitants of Trenton, 38 N. J. Law, 64, 67, the court said: "In the construction of a statute, every part of it must be viewed in connection with the whole, so as to make all its parts harmonize, if practicable, and give a sensible and intelligent effect to each." The Legislature did not intend that amendment of 1933 to be without meaning. See, also, John Farrell v. State, 54 N. J. Law, 421, 24 A. 725, 726, where the Court said: "A statute which is amended is thereafter, and as to all acts subsequently done, to be construed as if the amendment had always been there; and the amendment itself so thoroughly becomes a part of the original statute that it must be construed in view of the original statute as it stands after the amendments are introduced and the matters superseded by the amendments eliminated." The statute may place the prosecutor in an embarrassing position, in that, in the proper performance of his duty, he may require the aid of investigators beyond the number allowed by the statute and he may expect compensation be paid to those investigators, yet the amendatory act of 1933 offers no guaranty of the recognition of the expenses incurred. In Stephenson v. Stephenson, 102 N. J. Eq. 50, 139 A. 721, Justice Kalisch said: "In interpreting and construing statute, court must consider, first, old law; second, mischief; and, third, remedy." It may be well said that the legislature contemplating the conclusiveness of the certificate of the judge, as laid down in Lindabury v. Freeholders, sought to effectuate a change in the existing law and by this amendment did so. This is clearly a legislative right.

The plaintiff is seeking a judgment against the county of Bergen. I will conclude that the right of Adamo to compensation depends upon the approval by the board of chosen freeholders as a condition precedent to his right to such compensation.

There was no such approval. Under the circumstances, the complaint will be stricken.


Summaries of

Adamo v. Bergen County

CIRCUIT COURT OF NEW JERSEY, BERGEN COUNTY
Jul 10, 1935
179 A. 685 (Cir. Ct. 1935)
Case details for

Adamo v. Bergen County

Case Details

Full title:ADAMO v. BERGEN COUNTY.

Court:CIRCUIT COURT OF NEW JERSEY, BERGEN COUNTY

Date published: Jul 10, 1935

Citations

179 A. 685 (Cir. Ct. 1935)

Citing Cases

In re Application of Bigley

The courts mentioned in the statute having been abolished by constitutional amendment, the revision of 1951…

Cetrulo v. Byrne

Under N.J.S. 2 A:158-5 (formerly R.S. 2:182-5) the prosecutor is directed to "use all reasonable and lawful…