Adamo Demolition Co. v. Int'l Union of Operating Eng'rs Local 150

2 Citing cases

  1. IOU Cent. v. Div. Ave.

    1:21-cv-811 (W.D. Mich. Oct. 13, 2022)   Cited 1 times

    (quoting Urb. Assocs., Inc. v. Standex Elecs., Inc., 216 Fed.Appx. 495, 514 (6th Cir. 2007)). “The conduct must be ‘improper,' and ‘improper interference requires both the absence of justification and the purpose of interfering with [the] plaintiff's contractual rights.'” Adamo Demolition Co. v. Int'l Union of Operating Eng'rs Local 150, 439 F.Supp.3d 933, 942 (E.D. Mich. 2020) (quoting Winiemko v. Valenti, 513 N.W.2d 181, 185 & n.3 (Mich. Ct. App. 1994)). A valid loan agreement existed between IOU Central and Division which Division breached.

  2. Sweigert v. Cable News Network, Inc.

    20-cv-12933 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 21, 2022)   Cited 7 times

    . “A plaintiff claiming defamation must plead a defamation claim with specificity by identifying the exact language that the plaintiff alleges to be defamatory.” Adamo Demolition Co. v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers Local 150, 439 F.Supp.3d 933, 945 (E.D. Mich. 2020) (quoting Thomas M. Cooley Law Sch. v. Doe, 300 Mich.App. 245, 262 (2013)). Michigan law also requires defamation claims to specify the defamatory statements, and facts supporting alleged “falsity, negligence, or reckless disregard for the truth.”