From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ADA PORTAL v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 1, 2001
No. 00 Civ. 3516 (LTS)(KNF) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 1, 2001)

Opinion

No. 00 Civ. 3516 (LTS)(KNF)

January 2001.


PRELIMINARY PRE-TRIAL ORDER


1. It is hereby ORDERED that a pre-trial conference shall be held in the above-captioned matter on March 1, 2001 at 3:00 p.m. in Courtroom No. 444, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York 10007. It is further

2. ORDERED that counsel for the parties confer preliminarily at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the date set forth in paragraph 1 above to discuss the following matters:

As used in this Order, the term "counsel" shall, in the case of an individual party who is proceeding Pro-se, mean such party.

a. Facts that are not disputed and facts that are in dispute.

b. The disclosures required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1).

c. Contested and uncontested legal issues.

d. Settlement.

e. Whether mediation might facilitate resolution of the case.

f. Whether the case is to be tried to a jury.

g. Whether each party consents to trial of the case by a magistrate judge.
h. Anticipated further discovery and an appropriate deadline for the conclusion of discovery.
i. Whether expert witness evidence will be required, and appropriate deadlines for expert witness discovery.
j. Whether dispositive motions may be appropriate, and a deadline for such motions.
k. Evidence to be presented at trial and the length of time expected to be required for the presentation of evidence at trial.

It is further

3. ORDERED that counsel for all parties shall confer and shall prepare, execute and file with the Court no later than seven (7) days before the date set forth in paragraph 1 above a single document captioned PRE-CONFERENCE STATEMENT, which shall be signed by all counsel, which shall set forth the following information, and which shall constitute the written report required by Fed R. Civ. P. 26(f) if no such report has previously been submitted:

a. A concise statement of the nature of this action.

b. The status of settlement discussions and the prospects for settlement of the action in whole or in part, provided that the Pre-Conference Statement shall not disclose to the Court specific settlement offers or demands.
c. Whether any motions are pending or being briefed, and a concise description of the nature and status of any such motions.
d. A concise statement of each party's position as to the basis of this Court's jurisdiction of the action, with citations to all statutes relied upon and relevant facts as to citizenship and jurisdictional amount.
e. A concise statement of all material uncontested or admitted facts.

f. A concise statement of all uncontested legal issues.

g. A concise statement of all legal issues to be decided by the Court.

h. Each party's concise statement of material disputed facts.

i. A concise statement of the measure of proof and on whom the burden of proof falls as to each cause of action or defense.
j. A statement as to whether all parties consent to trial of the case by a magistrate judge (without identifying which parties have or have not so consented).
k. What, if any, changes should be made in the timing, form or requirements for disclosures under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a), including a statement as to when any disclosures required under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1) were made or will be made.
l. The status of discovery, including the subjects on which further disclosure may be needed, and whether any remaining discovery should be conducted in phases or be limited to or focus upon particular issues, a concise description of each party's plan for any remaining discovery and a proposed discovery cut-off date.
m. Whether and to what extent expert evidence will be required, and proposed deadlines for expert discovery.
n. What, if any, changes should be made in the limitations on discovery imposed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules of court, and what other limitations should be imposed.
o. A statement by each party as to whether the case is to be tried with or without a jury, and the number of trial days expected to be needed for presentation of that party's case.
p. What work, if any, remains before the case will be trial-ready.
q. Any other information you believe may assist the Court in advancing your case to settlement or trial.
r. Any other orders that should be entered by the Court under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c) or Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b) and (c).

It is further

4. ORDERED that counsel shall be prepared to discuss the foregoing at the pre-trial conference, as well as whether mediation may be helpful in resolving this case. It is further

5. ORDERED that counsel attending the pre-trial conference shall seek settlement authority from their respective clients prior to such conference. If counsel is not granted such authority, the client must be present in person or available by telephone so that a settlement can be consummated if possible. "Settlement authority," as used herein, includes the power to enter into stipulations and make admissions regarding all matters that the participants may reasonably anticipate discussing at the pre-trial conference including, but not limited to, the matters enumerated in the preceding paragraphs.

6. In the event that any party fails to comply with this Order, the Court may impose sanctions or take other action as appropriate. Such sanctions and action may include assessing costs and attorneys' fees, precluding evidence or defenses, dismissing the action, and/or the imposition of other appropriate penalties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

ADA PORTAL v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 1, 2001
No. 00 Civ. 3516 (LTS)(KNF) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 1, 2001)
Case details for

ADA PORTAL v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:ADA PORTAL, Plaintiff(s), -against- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 1, 2001

Citations

No. 00 Civ. 3516 (LTS)(KNF) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 1, 2001)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Jacoby

"The general rule in this circuit is that defendants who are jointly indicted should be tried together, and…