From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acuity v. Steinberg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 11, 2013
Case No.: 1:12-CV-188 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:12-CV-188

01-11-2013

ACUITY, Plaintiff, v. MARK STEINBERG, et al., Defendants.


Judge Timothy S. Black


CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court having been notified by the Plaintiff that this case settled on January 10, 2013;

It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may upon good cause shown within 45 days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Also, if desired, the parties may timely move to substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement.

The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement of the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Acuity v. Steinberg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 11, 2013
Case No.: 1:12-CV-188 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Acuity v. Steinberg

Case Details

Full title:ACUITY, Plaintiff, v. MARK STEINBERG, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 11, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 1:12-CV-188 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 11, 2013)