From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acuity v. Cushman

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Dec 28, 2016
SC: 153890 (Mich. Dec. 28, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 153890

12-28-2016

ACUITY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARDA CUSHMAN and WILLIAM CUSHMAN, Defendants-Appellees.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 325679
Kent CC: 14-002120-CZ

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 26, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Acuity v. Cushman

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Dec 28, 2016
SC: 153890 (Mich. Dec. 28, 2016)
Case details for

Acuity v. Cushman

Case Details

Full title:ACUITY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARDA CUSHMAN and WILLIAM CUSHMAN…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Dec 28, 2016

Citations

SC: 153890 (Mich. Dec. 28, 2016)