From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acteon, Inc. v. Harms

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Nov 13, 2020
1:20-cv-14851-NLH-AMD (D.N.J. Nov. 13, 2020)

Opinion

1:20-cv-14851-NLH-AMD

11-13-2020

ACTEON, INC., Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH B. HARMS, Defendant.

APPEARANCES: JORDAN ELLIOT PACE CHARLES J. FALLETTA SILLS CUMMIS EPSTEIN & GROSS, PC THE LEGAL CENTER ONE RIVERFRONT PLAZA NEWARK, NJ 07102-540 On behalf of Plaintiff JAMES S. RICHTER MIDLIGE RICHTER LLC 645 MARTINSVILLE ROAD BASKING RIDGE, NJ 07920 AVIVA GRUMET-MORRIS KARA E. COOPER WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 35 W. WACKER DRIVE CHICAGO, IL 60618 On behalf of Defendant


MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

APPEARANCES: JORDAN ELLIOT PACE
CHARLES J. FALLETTA
SILLS CUMMIS EPSTEIN & GROSS, PC
THE LEGAL CENTER
ONE RIVERFRONT PLAZA
NEWARK, NJ 07102-540

On behalf of Plaintiff JAMES S. RICHTER
MIDLIGE RICHTER LLC
645 MARTINSVILLE ROAD
BASKING RIDGE, NJ 07920 AVIVA GRUMET-MORRIS
KARA E. COOPER
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
35 W. WACKER DRIVE
CHICAGO, IL 60618

On behalf of Defendant HILLMAN , District Judge

WHEREAS, this matter concerns claims by Plaintiff Acteon, Inc. against its former employee, Defendant Joseph B. Harms, for breach of their agreements and trade secret violations when Harms began working for a competitor in the dental imaging industry; and

WHEREAS, in consideration of Acteon's Motion for Preliminary Injunction to enforce the non-competition provision in their contract and to prevent the disclosure of confidential and trade secret information to its competitor, on November 6, 2020, the Court entered the following Order in accordance with the reasoning expressed in the Court's Opinion:

ORDERED that Defendant Joseph B. Harms be, and hereby is, enjoined from his employment at 3Disc, and any other entity with a "competitive product" as defined by the parties' separation agreement, in the United States for the remaining duration of the one-year non-competition period; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant Joseph B. Harms be, and hereby is, enjoined from disclosing confidential information and trade secrets of Plaintiff Acteon, Inc.
(Docket No. 26); and

WHEREAS, on November 10, 2020, Harms filed a letter seeking clarification of this Order regarding whether he is permitted to perform this non-United States work while physically located the United States (Docket No. 27), a position that Acteon objects to (Docket No. 28), including pointing out that the Court's Order encompassed its trade secret violation claims, which are not limited to a specific geographical area, in addition to their claim for breach of the non-compete agreement; and

WHEREAS, the Court has considered the parties' arguments on the issue;

THEREFORE,

IT IS on this 13th day of November, 2020

ORDERED that the Court clarifies its November 6, 2020 Opinion and Order as follows:

ORDERED that Defendant Joseph B. Harms be, and hereby is, enjoined from his employment at 3Disc, and any other entity with a "competitive product" as defined by the parties' separation agreement, in the United States for the remaining duration of the one-year non-competition period; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant Joseph B. Harms may be physically located in the United States while he performs his job duties for non-United States entities and customers; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant Joseph B. Harms be, and hereby is, enjoined from disclosing confidential information and trade secrets of Plaintiff Acteon, Inc. anywhere in the world.

s/ Noel L. Hillman

NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J. At Camden, New Jersey


Summaries of

Acteon, Inc. v. Harms

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Nov 13, 2020
1:20-cv-14851-NLH-AMD (D.N.J. Nov. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Acteon, Inc. v. Harms

Case Details

Full title:ACTEON, INC., Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH B. HARMS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Nov 13, 2020

Citations

1:20-cv-14851-NLH-AMD (D.N.J. Nov. 13, 2020)