Opinion
2:21-cv-01962-GMN-BNW
01-07-2022
ACRES 4.0, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff, v. IGT, a Nevada Corporation, Defendant.
RICE REUTHER SULLIVAN & CARROLL, LLP GARMAN TURNER GORDON LLP David A. Carroll, Esq. Eric R. Olsen, Esq. Anthony J. DiRaimondo, Esq. Jared M. Sechrist Robert E. Opdyke, Esq. PERKINS COIE LLP Jerry A. Riedinger, Esq. Cory Owan, Esq.
RICE REUTHER SULLIVAN & CARROLL, LLP
GARMAN TURNER GORDON LLP
David A. Carroll, Esq.
Eric R. Olsen, Esq.
Anthony J. DiRaimondo, Esq.
Jared M. Sechrist
Robert E. Opdyke, Esq.
PERKINS COIE LLP
Jerry A. Riedinger, Esq.
Cory Owan, Esq.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
(FIRST REQUEST)
Pursuant to LR IA 6-1 and LR IA 6-2, the Parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to and request that Defendant IGT have an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff ACRES 4.0's Complaint (ECF No. 2). This is the first request to extend time to respond to the Complaint. Defendant IGT was served with the Complaint on December 22, 2021, the current deadline to respond is January 12, 2022, and the Parties stipulate to and request a forty-five day extension, up to and including February 28, 2022 .
There is good cause to grant the proposed extension to respond to the Complaint, due to conflicts that certain of IGT's counsel have experienced due to COVID-19, prior commitments in other pending matters, and personal commitments over the holidays. Dated: January 6th, 2022. Dated: January 6th, 2022.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.