From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acox v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Mar 7, 2012
381 P.3d 587 (Nev. 2012)

Opinion

No. 58769.

03-07-2012

Billy Max ACOX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Christopher R. Arabia Arthur F. Wehrmeister Attorney General/Carson City Les W. Bradshaw


Christopher R. Arabia

Arthur F. Wehrmeister

Attorney General/Carson City

Les W. Bradshaw

ORDER OF REVERSAL AND REMAND

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, of felony DUI. Fifth Judicial District Court, Esmeralda County; Dan L. Papez, Judge.

Appellant Billy Max Acox contends that the district court erred by sentencing him to a prison term of 4–10 years for a violation of NRS 484C.410(l)(a) when, in fact, he pleaded guilty to third-offense felony DUI pursuant to NRS 484C.400(l)(c), which provides for a possible prison term of 1–6 years. According to the criminal information, Acox was charged with third-offense felony DUI. The State concedes the error. We agree and remand the matter to the district court for a new sentencing hearing. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction REVERSED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order.


Summaries of

Acox v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Mar 7, 2012
381 P.3d 587 (Nev. 2012)
Case details for

Acox v. State

Case Details

Full title:Billy Max ACOX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Mar 7, 2012

Citations

381 P.3d 587 (Nev. 2012)