From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acosta v. Superintendent SCI Forest

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 7, 2024
Civil Action 20-1305 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 20-1305

02-07-2024

JAIME ACOSTA v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI FOREST, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA


ORDER

MURPHY, J.

AND NOW, this 7th day of February 2024, upon considering petitioner Jaime Acosta's motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) (DI 29), defendants' response in opposition (DI 30), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk of court is DIRECTED to reopen this case for purposes of considering Mr. Acosta's motion (DI 29).
2. Mr. Acosta's motion is DISMISSED in part for lack of jurisdiction without prejudice to his right to file with the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit an application to file a second or successive habeas petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A).
3. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) because reasonable jurists would not debate the propriety of this ruling. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
4. The clerk of court is DIRECTED to close this case.


Summaries of

Acosta v. Superintendent SCI Forest

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 7, 2024
Civil Action 20-1305 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 2024)
Case details for

Acosta v. Superintendent SCI Forest

Case Details

Full title:JAIME ACOSTA v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI FOREST, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 7, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 20-1305 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 2024)