From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acosta v. State

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 6, 2021
21-CV-4158 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-4158 (LTS)

08-06-2021

MIGUEL ANGEL ACOSTA, also known as MIGUEL ACOSTA BONILLA, Plaintiff, v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK; THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

By order dated May 18, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within sixty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Acosta v. State

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 6, 2021
21-CV-4158 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Acosta v. State

Case Details

Full title:MIGUEL ANGEL ACOSTA, also known as MIGUEL ACOSTA BONILLA, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 6, 2021

Citations

21-CV-4158 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2021)