Acosta v. State

Full title: Bryan ACOSTA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Oct 17, 2012

100 So. 3d 169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 3D12–2421.

2012-10-17

Bryan ACOSTA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, Ellen Sue Venzer, Judge. Bryan Acosta, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, Ellen Sue Venzer, Judge.
Bryan Acosta, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SUAREZ, CORTIÑAS and EMAS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246, 1251 (Fla.2001) (holding “the adjudication of a defendant as a habitual offender when the requisite ... felonies do not exist may be corrected pursuant to rule 3.800(a) so long as the error is apparent from the face of the record”); accord Rangel v. State, 937 So.2d 1218, 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).