From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acosta v. Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition of Fla., P.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
May 20, 2018
Case No: 2:17-cv-342-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. May. 20, 2018)

Opinion

Case No: 2:17-cv-342-FtM-38MRM

05-20-2018

ESTRELIA ACOSTA, an individual Plaintiff, v. PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY, HEPATOLOGY AND NUTRITION OF FLORIDA, P.A., Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court. --------

This matter comes before the Court on review of the parties' Joint Notice of No Compromise and Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 29), filed on May 1, 2018.

Plaintiff filed suit on June 19, 2017 to recover compensation allegedly owed to her under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). (Doc. 1). On July 26, 2017, Defendant filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses. (Doc. 9). The parties now inform the court that they have settled Plaintiff's claims in full without compromise. (Doc. 29 at 1). This being the case, the Court need not review and approve the settlement for fairness. See Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352 (11th Cir. 1982); see also King v. My Online Neighborhood, Inc., No. 6:06-cv-435-Orl-22JGG, 2007 WL 737575, at *3 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 7, 2007) ("Where the employer offers the plaintiff full compensation on his FLSA claim, no compromise is involved and judicial approval is not required.").

In addition, Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order by "a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Here, the parties agree to dismiss this case with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and have signed the Stipulation for Dismissal (Doc. 29 at 2). The Court thus dismisses the case with prejudice.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The parties' Joint Notice of No Compromise and Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 29) is GRANTED.

2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, terminate all pending motions and deadlines, and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 20th day of May, 2018.

/s/ _________

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies: All Parties of Record


Summaries of

Acosta v. Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition of Fla., P.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
May 20, 2018
Case No: 2:17-cv-342-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. May. 20, 2018)
Case details for

Acosta v. Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition of Fla., P.A.

Case Details

Full title:ESTRELIA ACOSTA, an individual Plaintiff, v. PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: May 20, 2018

Citations

Case No: 2:17-cv-342-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. May. 20, 2018)