From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acosta v. N.A.P.H. Care

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 15, 2010
2:09-cv-1998-RLH-RJJ (D. Nev. Oct. 15, 2010)

Opinion

2:09-cv-1998-RLH-RJJ.

October 15, 2010


ORDER


This matter was referred to the undersigned Magistrate judge on Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Extend Copy Work Limit (#13).

The Court having reviewed the Motion (#13) and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Extend Copy Work Limit (#13) is DENIED.

DATED this 15th day of October, 2010.


Summaries of

Acosta v. N.A.P.H. Care

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 15, 2010
2:09-cv-1998-RLH-RJJ (D. Nev. Oct. 15, 2010)
Case details for

Acosta v. N.A.P.H. Care

Case Details

Full title:ARTURO E. ACOSTA, Plaintiff, v. N.A.P.H. CARE, et al., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 15, 2010

Citations

2:09-cv-1998-RLH-RJJ (D. Nev. Oct. 15, 2010)