From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acosta v. McNeill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Oct 24, 2013
CASE NO. 2:13-cv-309-TMH [wo] (M.D. Ala. Oct. 24, 2013)

Summary

holding a plaintiff's guilty plea established probable cause for his arrest

Summary of this case from Holley v. Town of Camp Hill

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:13-cv-309-TMH [wo]

10-24-2013

ARNULFO ACOSTA, #94381-198, Plaintiff, v. J. RANDALL MCNEILL, et al., Defendants.


OPINION and ORDER

On September 24, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case dismissing this case with prejudice prior to service of process. Specifically, the Magistrate Judge Recommended that the §1983 claims presented against Defendants McNeill and Elmore County be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and/or (iii) and that Plaintiff's challenge to the constitutionality of the conviction and/or sentence imposed upon him by the Circuit Court for Elmore County, Alabama, be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of U.S.C.§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claims are not properly before the court at this time. (Doc. 9). No timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and that the claims presented against Defendants McNeill and Elmore County be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and/or (iii); that Plaintiff's challenge to the constitutionality of the conviction and/or sentence imposed upon him by the Circuit Court for Elmore County, Alabama, be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of U.S.C.§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claims are not properly before the court at this time ; and that the complaint be dismissed prior to service of process.

_____________

TRUMAN M. HOBBS

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Acosta v. McNeill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Oct 24, 2013
CASE NO. 2:13-cv-309-TMH [wo] (M.D. Ala. Oct. 24, 2013)

holding a plaintiff's guilty plea established probable cause for his arrest

Summary of this case from Holley v. Town of Camp Hill
Case details for

Acosta v. McNeill

Case Details

Full title:ARNULFO ACOSTA, #94381-198, Plaintiff, v. J. RANDALL MCNEILL, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 24, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 2:13-cv-309-TMH [wo] (M.D. Ala. Oct. 24, 2013)

Citing Cases

Prescott v. Georgia

In short, Plaintiff may not bring habeas corpus claims — alleging that he was wrongly convicted — in a civil…

Holley v. Town of Camp Hill

To the extent the Magistrate Judge concluded that collateral estoppel does not apply here, the Recommendation…