From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acosta v. Gallego

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Jun 22, 2022
No. CV-20-01823-PHX-SMB (D. Ariz. Jun. 22, 2022)

Opinion

CV-20-01823-PHX-SMB

06-22-2022

Mark Anthony Acosta, Plaintiff, v. Alejandro Gallego, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

HONORABLE SUSAN M. BRNOVICH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge Camille Bibles has issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that this case be dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute (Doc. 63). The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 3-4) (citing Rule 72, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and agrees with the analysis of Magistrate Judge Bibles. The Court will accept and adopt the R&R.

IT IS ORDERED that this case be dismissed without prejudice and directing the Clerk of Court to terminate this case.


Summaries of

Acosta v. Gallego

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Jun 22, 2022
No. CV-20-01823-PHX-SMB (D. Ariz. Jun. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Acosta v. Gallego

Case Details

Full title:Mark Anthony Acosta, Plaintiff, v. Alejandro Gallego, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Jun 22, 2022

Citations

No. CV-20-01823-PHX-SMB (D. Ariz. Jun. 22, 2022)