From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acosta v. Fidelity New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 1996
227 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

May 13, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Newmark, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's second and third causes of action sounding in defamation. The plaintiff failed to comply with the requirement set forth in CPLR 3016 (a) that the "particular words complained of shall be set forth in the complaint" (CPLR 3016 [a]; see also, Varela v. Investors Ins. Holding Corp., 185 A.D.2d 309). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Acosta v. Fidelity New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 1996
227 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Acosta v. Fidelity New York

Case Details

Full title:SALOMON ACOSTA, Appellant, v. FIDELITY NEW YORK et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 13, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
643 N.Y.S.2d 361

Citing Cases

Wyllie v. District Attorney, Co., Kings

The fourth (malicious prosecution) cause of action should have been dismissed because a prosecutor is…

KYUSUNG CHO v. YOUN TAE YOO

A review of the amended complaint establishes that the Yoo counterclaim never particularizes or recounts the…