From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acosta v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
May 17, 2023
No. 1833-23S (U.S.T.C. May. 17, 2023)

Opinion

1833-23S

05-17-2023

JAVIER ACOSTA, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge

On April 13, 2023, respondent filed in the above-docketed matter a Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, on the ground that the petition herein was not filed within the time prescribed by section 6213(a) or 7502 of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.). Respondent attached to the motion a copy of a certified mail list, as evidence of the fact that a notice of deficiency for 2020 dated September 12, 2022, had been sent to petitioner by certified mail on September 8, 2022.

Subsequently, on May 12, 2023, petitioner filed an objection to respondent's motion. Therein, among other things, petitioner stated without further specifics: "Procedural errors were committed when notice was served on me, I was out of the country when I was served and did not have appropriate time to respond to the notice". As such, the objection raised the question whether a basis might exist for applying the extension provisions of section 6213(a), I.R.C. See Smith v. Commissioner, 140 T.C. 48 (2013).

The premises considered, it is

ORDERED that, on or before June 12, 2023, petitioner shall file a supplement to the just-referenced objection and shall attach thereto copies of passport entries and/or flight itineraries indicating the dates that petitioner was outside the United States.


Summaries of

Acosta v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
May 17, 2023
No. 1833-23S (U.S.T.C. May. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Acosta v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:JAVIER ACOSTA, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: May 17, 2023

Citations

No. 1833-23S (U.S.T.C. May. 17, 2023)