From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acosta v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr. and Rehab.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 15, 2021
1:20-cv-01209-DAD-EPG-PC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-01209-DAD-EPG-PC

07-15-2021

LOUIS ACOSTA, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND (ECF No. 28)

Defendants McNeal, Montoya, and Moore have filed an ex parte application for extension of time in which to respond to the First Amended Complaint. Having considered the application, the Court finds good cause to grant such extension request.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' request for an extension of time (ECF No. 28) is granted; and
2. Defendants shall file their responsive pleading within twenty-eight days of service of the Court's ruling on the pending Findings and Recommendations recommending that Plaintiffs motion for leave to amend be granted (ECF No. 26).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Acosta v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr. and Rehab.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 15, 2021
1:20-cv-01209-DAD-EPG-PC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Acosta v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr. and Rehab.

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS ACOSTA, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 15, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-01209-DAD-EPG-PC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2021)