From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acocella v. Brinkman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 11, 1938
254 App. Div. 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

March 11, 1938.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.


In an action for specific performance of a verbal contract, order denying defendant's motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence unanimously affirmed. with costs, payable by the appellant personally. No opinion.


Summaries of

Acocella v. Brinkman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 11, 1938
254 App. Div. 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Acocella v. Brinkman

Case Details

Full title:LOUISA ACOCELLA, Respondent, v. FREDERICK H. BRINKMAN, Individually and as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 11, 1938

Citations

254 App. Div. 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)