From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acme, Palmers & De Mooy Foundry Co. v. Weiss

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nov 15, 1928
30 F.2d 1007 (6th Cir. 1928)

Opinion

No. 5033.

November 15, 1928.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio; Paul Jones, Judge.

For opinion below, see 21 F.2d 492.

Frankel, Brunenkant Frankel, of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff in error.

A.E. Bernsteen, U.S. Atty., and Irene Nungesser, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Cleveland, Ohio, and F.F. Toomey, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D.C., for defendant in error.


Judgment of District Court affirmed, with costs, on authority of Law v. U.S., 266 U.S. 494, 45 S. Ct. 175, 69 L. Ed. 401, Fleischmann Co. v. U.S., 270 U.S. 349, 46 S. Ct. 284, 70 L. Ed. 624, Oyler v. Railway Co., 16 F.2d 455, and Frankle Bros. Co. v. Routzahn, 26 F.2d 1018.


Summaries of

Acme, Palmers & De Mooy Foundry Co. v. Weiss

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nov 15, 1928
30 F.2d 1007 (6th Cir. 1928)
Case details for

Acme, Palmers & De Mooy Foundry Co. v. Weiss

Case Details

Full title:ACME, PALMERS DE MOOY FOUNDRY CO. v. Harry H. WEISS, Formerly U.S…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Nov 15, 1928

Citations

30 F.2d 1007 (6th Cir. 1928)