Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Acme Markets, Inc. v. Callanan

378 Ill. App. 3d 676 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Acme Markets, Inc. v. Callanan

7 Citing cases

  1. Acme Markets v. Callanan

    236 Ill. 2d 29 (Ill. 2009)   Cited 54 times

    The appellate court affirmed with one justice specially concurring and one justice dissenting. 378 Ill. App. 3d 676. We granted the taxpayers' petition for leave to appeal. 210 Ill. 2d R. 315. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgments of the appellate and circuit courts and remand the cause to the circuit court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

  2. Lasalle Bank v. Cypress Creek 1

    398 Ill. App. 3d 592 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010)   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Apportionment of sheriff's sale proceeds and statutory interpretation are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Acme Markets, Inc. v. Callanan, 378 Ill. App. 3d 676, 677-78, 882 N.E.2d 181, 182 (2008). In claiming that their liens have priority over LaSalle's mortgage, Edon and Eagle misread the requirements set forth in section 16 of the Act.

  3. Acme Markets, Inc. v. Callanan

    228 Ill. 2d 529 (Ill. 2008)

    No. 106198.May 2008 378 Ill. App. 3d 676. Disposition of Petitions for Leave to Appeal Allowed.

  4. 1400 Wolf Rd., LLC v. Pappas

    2020 IL App (1st) 192030 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020)

    PTELL is also commonly known by the name of its predecessor, the Tax Cap Act. See Acme Markets, Inc. v. Callanan, 378 Ill. App. 3d 676, 679 (2008). --------

  5. Brown v. Hammer

    2016 Ill. App. 2d 160349 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016)

    "The purpose of [the] PTELL 'is to provide citizens greater control over the levy of taxes they are required to pay.' " Acme Markets, Inc. v. Callanan, 236 Ill. 2d 29, 42 (2009) (quoting Acme Markets, Inc. v. Callanan, 378 Ill. App. 3d 676, 684 (2008) (McDade, P.J., dissenting)). In general, taxing districts subject to the PTELL cannot extend taxes at a rate that exceeds the "extension limitation" without referendum approval.

  6. Pedersen & Houpt, P.C. v. Main St. Vill. W., Part 1, LLC

    2012 Ill. App. 112971 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013)   Cited 11 times

    ¶ 14 A. Standard of Review¶ 15 This decision involves statutory interpretations of the Attorneys Lien Act and the Mechanics Lien Act. Statutory interpretations are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Acme Markets, Inc. v. Callanan, 378 Ill.App.3d 676, 677–78, 317 Ill.Dec. 607, 882 N.E.2d 181 (2008). The parties are correctly in agreement that the standard of review to be employed in this action is de novo review.

  7. Pedersen & Houpt, P.C. v. Main St. Vill. W.

    2012 Ill. App. 112 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012)

    ¶ 14 A. Standard of Review ¶ 15 This decision involves statutory interpretations of the Attorneys Lien Act and the Mechanics Lien Act. Statutory interpretations are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Acme Markets, Inc. v. Callanan, 378 Ill. App. 3d 676, 677-78 (2008). The parties are correctly in agreement that the standard of review to be employed in this action is de novo review.