From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ackley v. Carroll

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2012
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00771-AWI-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00771-AWI-BAM PC

01-24-2012

DONALD J. ACKLEY, Plaintiff, v. D. CARROLL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (ECF Nos. 65, 80)

Plaintiff Donald J. Ackley ("Plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, filed this action on June 19, 2006. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

Plaintiff filed a motion seeking the issuance of a preliminary injunction mandating the return of his legal property or that the property be protected on September 9, 2011. (ECF No. 67.) On September 28, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations recommending the motion be denied and informing the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 65.) On November 8, 2011, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address in which he seeks an injunction directing that all his personal property be transported to the new prison. (ECF No. 78). On December 13, 2011, a findings and recommendations issued recommending denial of the motion and again informing the parties that objections were to be filed within thirty days. More than thirty days have passed and no objections have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations, filed September 28 and December 13, 2011, are adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiff's motions for injunctive relief filed September 9 and December 8, 2011, are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ackley v. Carroll

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2012
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00771-AWI-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Ackley v. Carroll

Case Details

Full title:DONALD J. ACKLEY, Plaintiff, v. D. CARROLL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 24, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00771-AWI-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2012)