From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ackerson v. Elliott

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 12, 2023
2:21-cv-2205 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-2205 WBS KJN P

01-12-2023

ELTON ACKERSON, Plaintiff, v. ELLIOTT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On January 9, 2023, nonparty Leonard Ransom, Jr., purported to file a motion to intervene in a putative discovery dispute in this action. Mr. Ransom was previously assisting plaintiff in the preparation of court filings but was transferred to a different prison on December 6, 2022. Mr. Ransom appended his declaration attesting that in mid-November he served interrogatories on counsel for defendants, and now such counsel “is implying” that she never received the interrogatories.

However, no discovery motion is pending in this action. Moreover, Mr. Ransom did not file a certificate of service attesting to service of his proposed filing on either plaintiff or counsel for defendants. The nonparty's motion is denied and his declaration is disregarded.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The January 9, 2023 motion to intervene is denied; and
2. The nonparty's declaration is disregarded.


Summaries of

Ackerson v. Elliott

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 12, 2023
2:21-cv-2205 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Ackerson v. Elliott

Case Details

Full title:ELTON ACKERSON, Plaintiff, v. ELLIOTT, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 12, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-2205 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2023)