From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ackerman v. Lorenzo

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 18, 2023
3:23-cv-00061-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Oct. 18, 2023)

Opinion

3:23-cv-00061-ART-CLB

10-18-2023

JIN ACKERMAN, Plaintiff v. LORENZO, et al., Defendants

AARON D. FORD, Victoria C. Corey Attorneys for Defendant Jin Ackerman Plaintiff, pro se.


AARON D. FORD, Victoria C. Corey Attorneys for Defendant

Jin Ackerman Plaintiff, pro se.

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

Anne R. Traum, United States District Judge

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Interested Party, Nevada Department of Corrections, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and Victoria C. Corey, Deputy Attorney General, of the State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney General, and Jin Ackerman, Pro Se Plaintiff, under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the above-captioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing their own attorney's fees and costs.

The Parties have resolved this matter in its entirety and agree that the Court may accordingly close the case, with prejudice. Any outstanding deadlines are considered moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk is directed to close the case.


Summaries of

Ackerman v. Lorenzo

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 18, 2023
3:23-cv-00061-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Oct. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Ackerman v. Lorenzo

Case Details

Full title:JIN ACKERMAN, Plaintiff v. LORENZO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 18, 2023

Citations

3:23-cv-00061-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Oct. 18, 2023)