From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ackerman v. Hanf

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 16, 2022
3:22-cv-00035-RCJ-CLB (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00035-RCJ-CLB

08-16-2022

JIN ACKERMAN, Plaintiff, v. HANF, et al., Defendants.

JIN ACKERMAN Plaintiff, Pro Se AARON D. FORD Attorney General WILLIAM P. SHOGREN, Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants


JIN ACKERMAN Plaintiff, Pro Se

AARON D. FORD Attorney General WILLIAM P. SHOGREN, Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

Defendants, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Nevada Attorney General, and William P. Shogren, Deputy Attorney General, of the State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney General; and Plaintiff Jin Ackerman, pro se, under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, stipulate that the above-captioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing their own attorney's fees and costs.

The Parties have resolved this matter in its entirety and agree that the Court may accordingly close the case, with prejudice. Any outstanding deadlines are considered moot.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the Clerk is directed to close the case.


Summaries of

Ackerman v. Hanf

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 16, 2022
3:22-cv-00035-RCJ-CLB (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Ackerman v. Hanf

Case Details

Full title:JIN ACKERMAN, Plaintiff, v. HANF, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 16, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-00035-RCJ-CLB (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2022)