From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ackerman v. Drummond

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 16, 2023
3:23-cv-00103-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Oct. 16, 2023)

Opinion

3:23-cv-00103-MMD-CLB

10-16-2023

JIN ACKERMAN Plaintiffs v. DAVID DRUMMOND, et al., Defendants

AARON D. FORD, Victoria C Corey, Attorneys for Defendant Jin Ackerman Plaintiff, pro se


AARON D. FORD, Victoria C Corey, Attorneys for Defendant

Jin Ackerman Plaintiff, pro se

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Interested Party, Nevada Department of Corrections, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and Victoria C. Corey, Deputy Attorney General, of the State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney General, and Jin Ackerman, Pro Se Plaintiff, under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the above-captioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing their own attorney's fees and costs.

The Parties have resolved this matter in its entirety and agree that the Court may accordingly close the case, with prejudice. Any outstanding deadlines are considered moot. DATED this 19th day of September, 2023. DATED this 19th day of September, 2023.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the Clerk is directed to close the case.


Summaries of

Ackerman v. Drummond

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 16, 2023
3:23-cv-00103-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Oct. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Ackerman v. Drummond

Case Details

Full title:JIN ACKERMAN Plaintiffs v. DAVID DRUMMOND, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 16, 2023

Citations

3:23-cv-00103-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Oct. 16, 2023)