From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ackerman v. Burch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 30, 1972
40 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

November 30, 1972

Appeal from the Allegany County Court.

Present — Goldman, P.J., Del Vecchio, Witmer and Cardamone, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, without costs and motion for summary judgment denied. Memorandum: This is the second time this action has been before us on defendant's claim that he has a right of way through the center of the property now owned by plaintiffs. On the first appeal ( 35 A.D.2d 770) we stated that, although defendant's "contentions are not very impressive", we held that he "should be given an opportunity to interpose his defense" and present proof which he asserted existed to support his position that he did have a right of way. Although the County Court's memorandum acknowledged that "It may well be that defendant is entitled to an easement of necessity", the court held that defendant had failed "to create a triable issue of fact". We find that the supplemental affidavit of James O'Shea, the aerial maps and photographs raise an issue of fact as to the existence of a right of way by implication which cannot be resolved without a trial. In view of this decision the motion to hold in contempt is denied without prejudice to renew if there is further violation.


Summaries of

Ackerman v. Burch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 30, 1972
40 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Ackerman v. Burch

Case Details

Full title:MANLEY ACKERMAN et al., Respondents, v. CARL J. BURCH, Appellant. (Appeal…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1972

Citations

40 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)