Opinion
No. 20-6358
11-05-2020
SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ROBERT L. MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT LEWIS; C. HINDENBURG; OFFICER JACOBS, Defendants - Appellees.
Supreme Raheem Ackbar, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (4:19-cv-02045-RMG) Before KEENAN, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Supreme Raheem Ackbar, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Supreme Raheem Ackbar appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Ackbar's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ackbar v. Lewis, No. 4:19-cv-02045-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 4, 2020). We deny Ackbar's motion to vacate the district court's opinion and judgment and his supplemental motion to vacate the district court's opinion and judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED