From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acinelli v. Torres

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION
Jul 16, 2015
No. ED CV 13-1371-AB (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2015)

Opinion

No. ED CV 13-1371-AB (PLA)

07-16-2015

SAMUEL ANTHONY ACINELLI, Jr., Plaintiff, v. KIRK ANTHONY TORRES, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S INTERIM REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Fourth Amended Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the magistrate judge's interim report and recommendation. The Court accepts the recommendations of the magistrate judge.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Interim Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted.

2. Defendant's motion to dismiss is granted.

3. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim for inadequate medical care is dismissed without leave to amend and with prejudice.

4. Plaintiff's state law claims are dismissed with leave to amend.

5. Plaintiff is ordered, if he desires to pursue his state law claims, to file a Fifth Amended Complaint no later than thirty (30) days of the date of service of this Order accepting this Report and Recommendation. The Fifth Amended Complaint must bear the docket number assigned in this case, be labeled "Fifth Amended Complaint," and be complete in and of itself without reference to any other pleading or document (plaintiff is advised that he must include his sexual assault claim against Dr. Torres if he chooses to file a Fifth Amended Complaint).

6. Defendant is ordered, if plaintiff fails to timely file a Fifth Amended Complaint, to file an answer to plaintiff's sexual assault claim as alleged in the Fourth Amended Complaint no later than thirty (30) days after plaintiff's date for filing a Fifth Amended Complaint has passed.

7. The clerk shall serve this order on all counsel or parties of record. DATED: July 16, 2015

/s/_________

HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Acinelli v. Torres

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION
Jul 16, 2015
No. ED CV 13-1371-AB (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Acinelli v. Torres

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL ANTHONY ACINELLI, Jr., Plaintiff, v. KIRK ANTHONY TORRES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 16, 2015

Citations

No. ED CV 13-1371-AB (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2015)

Citing Cases

Houston v. Rio Consumnes Corr. Facility

Accordingly, application of these three factors to determine plaintiff's eligibility was proper and did not…