From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acharya v. Hauser

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 14, 2012
463 F. App'x 932 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2011-1452

02-14-2012

BARUN ACHARYA AND XINGEN DONG, Appellants, v. RAYMOND HAUSER AND LONNIE E. HOLDER, Appellees.

JAY R. CAMPBELL, Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were DON W. BULSON, TODD R. TUCKER, KYLE B. FLEMING and NICHOLAS J. GINGO. THOMAS C. MCDONOUGH, Neal Gerber & Eisenberg, LLP, of Chicago, illinois, argued for appellees. With him on the brief was LAWRENCE E. JAMES, JR. Of counsel on the brief were CHARLES L. GHOLZ and W. TODD BAKER, Obion, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C., of Alexandria, Virginia.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Interference No. 105,750.

JUDGMENT

JAY R. CAMPBELL, Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were DON W. BULSON, TODD R. TUCKER, KYLE B. FLEMING and NICHOLAS J. GINGO.

THOMAS C. MCDONOUGH, Neal Gerber & Eisenberg, LLP, of Chicago, illinois, argued for appellees. With him on the brief was LAWRENCE E. JAMES, JR. Of counsel on the brief were CHARLES L. GHOLZ and W. TODD BAKER,

Obion, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C., of Alexandria, Virginia. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LINN, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

____________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

Acharya v. Hauser

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 14, 2012
463 F. App'x 932 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Acharya v. Hauser

Case Details

Full title:BARUN ACHARYA AND XINGEN DONG, Appellants, v. RAYMOND HAUSER AND LONNIE E…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 14, 2012

Citations

463 F. App'x 932 (Fed. Cir. 2012)