From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acey v. Inductev

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 27, 2024
Civil Action 23-1438 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 27, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 23-1438

02-27-2024

ASSATA ACEY, Plaintiff v. INDUCTEV, Defendant


ORDER

GENE E.K. PRATTER, United States District Judge

AND NOW, this 27th day of February 2024, upon consideration of Plaintiff s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 5) and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. No. 10), for the reasons explained in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 5) is DENIED;

2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 10) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:

a. Counts I, II, III, IV, IX, XIV, and XX are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

b. Counts XIII, XV, and XVI are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

c. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 10) is DENIED with respect to Counts V, VI, VII, VIII, X, XI, XII, XVII, XVIII, and XIX.


Summaries of

Acey v. Inductev

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 27, 2024
Civil Action 23-1438 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 27, 2024)
Case details for

Acey v. Inductev

Case Details

Full title:ASSATA ACEY, Plaintiff v. INDUCTEV, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 27, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 23-1438 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 27, 2024)

Citing Cases

Henderson v. Newark Bd. of Educ.

As with Plaintiff's disparate treatment claim, Plaintiff's hostile work environment claim fails due to the…