From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ace Capital Ltd. v. ePlanning, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jul 23, 2012
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-01511-JAM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-01511-JAM-EFB

07-23-2012

ACE CAPITAL LIMITED, ACE CAPITAL IV LIMITED, ACE CAPITAL V LIMITED and BRIT UW LIMITED, Plaintiffs, v. ePLANNING, INC.; Eplanning SECURITIES, INC.; ePLANNING ADVISORS, INC.; et al., Defendant-Claimants.

SEDGWICK LLP Michael L. Fox Attorneys for Plaintiffs Law Offices of Richard S. Miller Richard S. Miller Attorney for The Anderson Defendant-Claimants Hornstein Law Offices Val Hornstein Attorney for The Jamison Defendant-Claimants and Arthur Kransberger Maire & Burgess Patrick L. Deedon Attorney for The Nowacki Defendant-Claimants Maire & Burgess Patrick L. Deedon Attorney for The Oakdale Heights Defendant-Claimants Cappello & Noel LLP Troy A. Thielemann Attorney for The Roseville Defendant-Claimants Law Offices of Jeffery J. Swanson Jeffery J. Swanson Attorney for The Wood River Defendant-Claimants Law Offices of Jeffrey A. Feldman Jeffrey A. Feldman Attorney for The Alvarado Defendant-Claimants Law Office of George Donaldson George Donaldson Attorney for The Ambrosio Defendant-Claimants Carle, Mackie, Power & Ross LLP Philip J. Terry Attorney for Defendant-Claimants Terri Stupar and Patty Bergstrom Law Offices of David L. Edwards David L. Edwards Attorney for Defendant-Claimants Sue Pricco and Paul Freese Roxanne Davis Jones, Individually and as Trustee of the Roxanne Davis Jones 2001 Revocable Family Trust, in pro per Sally Weber, in pro per


JEFFERY J. SWANSON (#155118)

Attorney for The Wood River Defendant-Claimants

STIPULATION TO EXTEND

DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT


Judge: The Honorable John A. Mendez

The Anderson Defendant-Claimants, identified in paragraphs 26 - 151 of the Complaint herein, by and through their counsel of record, Richard S. Miller, Esq. from the Law Offices of Richard S. Miller;

The Jamison Defendant-Claimants, identified in paragraphs 153 - 198 of the Complaint herein, and Arthur Kransberger (Complaint paragraph 399), by and through their counsel of record, Val Hornstein, Esq. from the Hornstein Law Offices;

The Nowacki Defendant-Claimants, identified in paragraphs 200 - 211 of the Complaint herein, by and through their counsel of record, Patrick L. Deedon, Esq. from Maire & Burgess;

The Oakdale Heights Defendant-Claimants, identified in paragraphs 213 - 259 of the Complaint herein, by and through their counsel of record, Patrick L. Deedon, Esq. from Maire & Burgess;

The Roseville Defendant-Claimants, identified in paragraphs 261 - 292 of the Complaint herein, by and through their counsel of record, Troy A. Thielemann, Esq. from Capello & Noel LLP;

The Wood River Defendant-Claimants, identified in paragraphs 294 - 366 of the Complaint herein, by and through their counsel of record, Jeffery J. Swanson, Esq. from the Law Offices of Jeffery J. Swanson;

The Alvarado Defendant-Claimants, identified in paragraphs 368 - 369 of the Complaint herein, by and through their counsel of record, Jeffrey A. Feldman, Esq. from the Law Offices of Jeffrey A. Feldman;

The Ambrosio Defendant-Claimants, identified in paragraphs 371 - 392 of the Complaint herein, by and through their counsel of record, George Donaldson, Esq. from the Law Office of George Donaldson;

Terri Stupar and Patti Bergstrom, Defendant-Claimants, by and through their counsel of record, Philip J. Terry, Esq., from Carle, Mackie, Power & Ross LLP;

Sue Pricco and Paul Freese, Defendant-Claimants, by and through their counsel of record, David L. Edwards, Esq.;

Roxanne Davis Jones, Individually and as Trustee of the Roxanne Davis Jones 2001 Revocable Family Trust, Defendant-Claimant, in pro per;

Sally Weber, Defendant-Claimant, in pro per; and

Plaintiffs Ace Capital Limited, Ace Capital IV Limited, Ace Capital V Limited, and Brit UW Limited, by and through their counsel of record, Michael L. Fox, Esq. of Sedgwick LLP, hereby stipulate, subject to the Court's approval, that the defendants identified above may file their response(s) to the Complaint on or before August 15, 2012. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

SEDGWICK LLP

By: _________________

Michael L. Fox

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Law Offices of Richard S. Miller

By: _________________

Richard S. Miller

Attorney for The Anderson Defendant-Claimants

Hornstein Law Offices

By: _________________

Val Hornstein

Attorney for The Jamison Defendant-Claimants

and Arthur Kransberger

Maire & Burgess

By: _________________

Patrick L. Deedon

Attorney for The Nowacki Defendant-Claimants

Maire & Burgess

By: _________________

Patrick L. Deedon

Attorney for The Oakdale Heights Defendant-Claimants

Cappello & Noel LLP

By: _________________

Troy A. Thielemann

Attorney for The Roseville Defendant-Claimants

Law Offices of Jeffery J. Swanson

By: _________________

Jeffery J. Swanson

Attorney for The Wood River Defendant-Claimants

Law Offices of Jeffrey A. Feldman

By: _________________

Jeffrey A. Feldman

Attorney for The Alvarado Defendant-Claimants

Law Office of George Donaldson

By: _________________

George Donaldson

Attorney for The Ambrosio Defendant-Claimants

Carle, Mackie, Power & Ross LLP

By: _________________

Philip J. Terry

Attorney for Defendant-Claimants Terri Stupar and

Patty Bergstrom

Law Offices of David L. Edwards

By: _________________

David L. Edwards

Attorney for Defendant-Claimants Sue Pricco and Paul Freese

Roxanne Davis Jones, Individually and as Trustee of

the Roxanne Davis Jones 2001 Revocable Family

Trust, in pro per

By:_________________

Sally Weber, in pro per

By: _________________ PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

John A. Mendez

United States District Court Judge

Certification Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B)

I, Jeffery J. Swanson, certify that concurrence in the filing of the attached Joint Stipulation to Extend Defendants' Deadline to Respond to Complaint has been obtained from each signatory listed.

_________________

JEFFERY J. SWANSON

Attorney for The Wood River Defendant

Claimants.


Summaries of

Ace Capital Ltd. v. ePlanning, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jul 23, 2012
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-01511-JAM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Ace Capital Ltd. v. ePlanning, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ACE CAPITAL LIMITED, ACE CAPITAL IV LIMITED, ACE CAPITAL V LIMITED and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Jul 23, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-01511-JAM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2012)