From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ace Am. Ins. Co. v. Gregorski

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Jul 5, 2018
246 So. 3d 574 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. 3D18–508

07-05-2018

ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Kenneth Mark GREGORSKI, et al., Respondents.

Cooney Trybus Kwavnick Peets, and Warren Kwavnick (Fort Lauderdale), for petitioner. Kenneth Gregorski, pro se, respondent.


Cooney Trybus Kwavnick Peets, and Warren Kwavnick (Fort Lauderdale), for petitioner.

Kenneth Gregorski, pro se, respondent.

Before SUAREZ, SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Ace American Insurance Company ("Insurer") seeks a writ of certiorari quashing a circuit court order denying the Insurer's motion to dismiss the respondent's, Mr. Gregorski's, complaint for declaratory relief. The petition and appendix established that Mr. Gregorski's complaint for third-party coverage failed to comply with the non-joinder provisions of section 627.4136, Florida Statutes (2017).

Mr. Gregorski's counsel in the circuit court proceeding did not appear in response to the petition, nor did Mr. Gregorski himself file a response. Finding the petition well taken, we grant it and quash the order denying the Insurer's motion to dismiss. Lantana Ins., Ltd. v. Thornton, 118 So.3d 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). See also GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. v. Martinez, 240 So.3d 43 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

Petition granted, order quashed.


Summaries of

Ace Am. Ins. Co. v. Gregorski

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Jul 5, 2018
246 So. 3d 574 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Ace Am. Ins. Co. v. Gregorski

Case Details

Full title:Ace American Insurance Company, Petitioner, v. Kenneth Mark Gregorski, et…

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Jul 5, 2018

Citations

246 So. 3d 574 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)