From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Accounting Tabulating Mach. v. C.I.R

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 11, 1932
55 F.2d 1075 (3d Cir. 1932)

Opinion

No. 4627.

February 11, 1932.

Appeal from United States Board of Tax Appeals.

Wm. S. James, of New York City, for appellant.

G.A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., Wm. Cutler Thompson, Sewall Key, and John MacC. Hudson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (C.M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and J.M. Leinenkugel, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellee.

Before WOOLLEY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and JOHNSON, District Judge.


The order of the United States Board of Tax Appeals, determining against the petitioner a deficiency tax on a finding that the corporations in question were not affiliated and therefore denying them the right to make a consolidated return, 21 B.T.A. 951, is ruled by the decision in Handy Harman v. Burnet, Commissioner, 52 S. Ct. 51, 76 L. Ed. ___, rendered since the argument.

The order is affirmed.


Summaries of

Accounting Tabulating Mach. v. C.I.R

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 11, 1932
55 F.2d 1075 (3d Cir. 1932)
Case details for

Accounting Tabulating Mach. v. C.I.R

Case Details

Full title:ACCOUNTING TABULATING MACHINE CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Feb 11, 1932

Citations

55 F.2d 1075 (3d Cir. 1932)