Summary
In Acacia, the court extended the stay requested by the defendant, the United States, after finding that the reasons the court initially granted the stay were still in effect.
Summary of this case from Estate of Hernandez-Rojas v. Customs & Border Patrol Agent 7663Opinion
1:07-cv-1129 AWI GSA.
April 25, 2008
McGREGOR W. SCOTT, United States Attorney, G. PATRICK JENNINGS, ERIN B. ASHWELL, Trial Attorneys, Tax Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Attorneys for the United States of America.
ORDER
This matter having come before the Court for a telephonic hearing on the United States' Motion for Protective Order, Dkt. #76, on April 22, 2008 at 10:30 a.m., and having reviewed the parties' submissions:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the United States shall not be required to respond to the document request submitted by Plaintiff Michael Ioane on March 21, 2008 until twenty (20) days after such time that the Court denies the United States' Motion for Stay, should the Court deny that Motion;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that neither party shall respond to any other discovery request until such time as the Court issues its ruling on the United States' Motion for Stay. If the Court denies the United States' Motion for Stay, the deadline to respond to any discovery requests will begin to run the day the Court issues its ruling.