AC Techs. S.A. v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Full title: AC TECHNOLOGIES S.A., Appellant v. AMAZON.COM, INC., BLIZZARD…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 9, 2019

2017-1999 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 9, 2019)

Opinion

2017-1999

01-09-2019

AC TECHNOLOGIES S.A., Appellant v. AMAZON.COM, INC., BLIZZARD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Appellees

MINGHUI YANG, Hardy Parrish Yang, LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by VICTOR G. HARDY. DANIEL T. SHVODIAN, Perkins Coie, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellees. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER LEE KELLEY, WING LIANG, VICTORIA Q. SMITH; DAN L. BAGATELL, Hanover, NH.

STOLL, Circuit Judge.

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015-01804. MINGHUI YANG, Hardy Parrish Yang, LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by VICTOR G. HARDY. DANIEL T. SHVODIAN, Perkins Coie, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellees. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER LEE KELLEY, WING LIANG, VICTORIA Q. SMITH; DAN L. BAGATELL, Hanover, NH. Before MOORE, SCHALL, and STOLL, Circuit Judges. STOLL, Circuit Judge.

Before us is AC Technologies S.A.'s appeal of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision that all claims of U.S. Patent 8,656,125 are unpatentable. On appeal, AC raises arguments substantially identical to those we rejected today in AC Technologies S.A. v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 18-1433. For the reasons explained in that decision, we affirm the Board.

AFFIRMED

COSTS

Costs to Appellees.