Opinion
Argued April 12, 1950
Decided May 18, 1950
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, TONEY, J.
Abraham Wilson, John Kadel and W. Philip Van Kirk for appellant.
Harold J. Treanor and Kenneth E. McLaughlin for respondents.
Order affirmed, with costs. This court does not read the Commercial Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 3, as amd.) as imposing an obligation for rent upon a tenant who has surrendered the premises although a subtenant remains in possession of a portion thereof. No opinion.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.