From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abston v. City of Merced

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 21, 2011
NEW CASE NO. 1:09-CV-511 -MJS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2011)

Opinion

NEW CASE NO. 1:09-CV-511 -MJS

10-21-2011

ABSTON ET.AL, Plaintiff v. CITY OF MERCED, ET. AL, Defendants


ORDER ASSIGNING CASE

RE PRESIDING JUDGE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled action be assigned to the docket of Judge MICHAEL J. SENGas Presiding Judge of the above entitled action. Plaintiff filed their consent on October 20, 2011 and Defendant filed their consent on October 14,2011 under Title 28, U.S.C. Sec. 636(c)(1) to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment.

ALL FUTURE PLEADINGS SHALL BE NUMBERED AS FOLLOWS:

1:09-cv-0511-MJS

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ____


Summaries of

Abston v. City of Merced

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 21, 2011
NEW CASE NO. 1:09-CV-511 -MJS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Abston v. City of Merced

Case Details

Full title:ABSTON ET.AL, Plaintiff v. CITY OF MERCED, ET. AL, Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 21, 2011

Citations

NEW CASE NO. 1:09-CV-511 -MJS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2011)

Citing Cases

Morales v. City of Delano

As this court has previously noted, negligence is measured by the same standard as battery and excessive use…

Enriquez v. City of Fresno

As Defendants point out, the negligence element of both of Plaintiff's tort claims is dependent on a…