From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abrams v. St. Amant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1908
125 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)

Opinion

April, 1908.


It was competent for the defendant to show that the bill of sale was intended merely as security. The evidence to show this being uncontradicted, should not have been disregarded. Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered costs to abide the event. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Abrams v. St. Amant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1908
125 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Case details for

Abrams v. St. Amant

Case Details

Full title:Carrie N. Abrams, Respondent, v. Samuel E. St. Amant, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1908

Citations

125 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)