From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abrams v. Powerhouse Gym Merrick, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 2001
284 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted May 23, 2001.

June 25, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), entered November 21, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Feder, Goldstein, Tanenbaum, D'Errico Arnedos, LLP, Carle Place, N Y, for appellant.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

While exercising at the defendant's gymnasium, the plaintiff was injured when he went to adjust the weights on a piece of exercise equipment and an improperly-placed bar suspended from the top of the machine fell on his head.

In premises liability cases alleging an injury caused by a defective condition, the plaintiff must show that the landowner either created the defective condition, or had actual or constructive notice of the defective condition for such a period of time that, in the exercise of reasonable care, it should have corrected it (see, Hollinger v. Chestnut Ridge Racquet Corp., 227 A.D.2d 380). There was no evidence that the defendant improperly placed the bar on the equipment, or had actual or constructive notice that this bar had been improperly placed on the equipment by another member. After the defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Therefore, the defendant's motion for summary judgment should have been granted.

O'BRIEN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN, SCHMIDT and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Abrams v. Powerhouse Gym Merrick, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 2001
284 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Abrams v. Powerhouse Gym Merrick, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GARY M. ABRAMS, respondent, v. POWERHOUSE GYM MERRICK, INC., appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 25, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
727 N.Y.S.2d 135

Citing Cases

Taylor v. State

The State, as a landowner, has a duty to maintain its property, including its prison facilities in a…

ST. PAUL MERCURY INS. v. PEPSI-COLA BOTTLING CO. OF NY

Under New York state law, in order for the defendant to be charged with the duty to correct a hazard on its…