From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abrams v. Lamone

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Aug 29, 2006
906 A.2d 346 (Md. 2006)

Opinion

No. 142, September Term, 2005.

August 29, 2006.

Stephen N. Abrams, Rockville, for appellant.

Andrew M. Dansicker (Joshua R. Treem, Schulman, Treem, Kaminkow, Gilden Ravenell, P.A., Baltimore, on brief), William F. Brockman, Asst. Atty.; Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., on brief), for appellees.


ORDER

The Court having considered the motion of Stuart 0. Simms, Candidate for Attorney General in the Democratic primary, to intervene or, in the alternative, for permission of the Court to submit an amicus curiae opposition to motion to modify order filed in the above captioned case, it is this 29th day of August, 2006,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the motion to intervene be, and it is hereby, denied, and it is further

ORDERED that the request for permission of the Court to submit an amicus curiae opposition to the motion to modify Order has been granted and considered.


Summaries of

Abrams v. Lamone

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Aug 29, 2006
906 A.2d 346 (Md. 2006)
Case details for

Abrams v. Lamone

Case Details

Full title:Stephen N. ABRAMS v. Linda H. LAMONE et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Aug 29, 2006

Citations

906 A.2d 346 (Md. 2006)
906 A.2d 346