From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abrams v. Church

United States District Court, E.D. Washington
Oct 18, 2006
No. CV-06-155-CI (E.D. Wash. Oct. 18, 2006)

Opinion

No. CV-06-155-CI.

October 18, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF


On September 27, 2006, Magistrate Judge Imbrogno recommended Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief be denied (Ct. Rec. 16). The deadline for filing objections was October 7, 2006, and the court did not receive Mr. Abrams's objections (Ct. Rec. 17) until October 12, 2006. Mr. Abrams asserts he wishes to make a record that "the doors to the U.S. District Court are being closed on him because he is unable to prepare documents as such as an attorney would, and that he doesn't have any one at the Grant County Jail to advise him in preparing legal documents, or in the law."

After review of the file and Plaintiff's Objections, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Ct. Rec. 15). IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief (Ct. Rec. 7) is DENIED with leave to renew. IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order and forward a copy to Plaintiff, along with a copy of the Local Rules for the Eastern District of Washington.


Summaries of

Abrams v. Church

United States District Court, E.D. Washington
Oct 18, 2006
No. CV-06-155-CI (E.D. Wash. Oct. 18, 2006)
Case details for

Abrams v. Church

Case Details

Full title:DUSTIN ABRAMS, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT CHURCH, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Washington

Date published: Oct 18, 2006

Citations

No. CV-06-155-CI (E.D. Wash. Oct. 18, 2006)