From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abrams v. Britton

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 3, 2010
Case No. 3:09-cv-71-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Sep. 3, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-cv-71-KRG-KAP.

September 3, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Petitioner's motion for reconsideration, docket no. 11, was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on October 30, 2010, docket no. 12, recommending that the motion be denied. The parties were notified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), that they had ten (now fourteen) days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections were filed and the time to do so has expired.

Upon review of the record of this matter and the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 2nd day of September 2010, it is

ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration, docket no. 11, is denied.


Summaries of

Abrams v. Britton

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 3, 2010
Case No. 3:09-cv-71-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Sep. 3, 2010)
Case details for

Abrams v. Britton

Case Details

Full title:JERMAINE ABRAMS, Petitioner, v. RANDALL BRITTON, SUPERINTENDENT, S.C.I…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 3, 2010

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cv-71-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Sep. 3, 2010)