From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ABRAMS v. BARNETT HASS

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jan 1, 1901
33 Misc. 774 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)

Opinion

January, 1901.

S. Cohen, for appellants.

M. Greenberg, for respondents.


The plaintiffs showed the sale and delivery of seventy-two dozen vests at two dollars and eighty cents per dozen, and the acceptance of the goods by the defendants.

It does not appear that the defendants ever offered to return the goods or even that they are now willing to return them unconditionally. No warranty that survived acceptance is alleged or shown, and no counterclaim was established.

It seems that upon the evidence presented the plaintiffs should have prevailed.

Present: TRUAX, P.J., SCOTT and DUGRO, JJ.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.


Summaries of

ABRAMS v. BARNETT HASS

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jan 1, 1901
33 Misc. 774 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)
Case details for

ABRAMS v. BARNETT HASS

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL J. ABRAMS et al., Appellants, v . BARNETT HASS et al., Respondents

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jan 1, 1901

Citations

33 Misc. 774 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)